Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of zero-valent iron (Fe 0 ) and several adsorbent materials in removing uranium (U) from contaminated groundwater and to investigate the rates and mechanisms that are involved in the reactions. Fe 0 filings were used as reductants, and the adsorbents included peat materials, iron oxides, and a carbon-based sorbent (Cercona Bone-Char). Results indicate that Fe 0 filings are much more effective than the adsorbents in removing uranyl (UO 2 2+ ) from the aqueous solution. Nearly 100% of U was removed through reactions with Fe 0 at an initial concentration up to 76 mM (or 18 000 mg of U/L). Results from the batch adsorption and desorption and from spectroscopic studies indicate that reductive precipitation of U on Fe 0 is the major reaction pathway. Only a small percentage (<4%) of UO 2 2+ appeared to be adsorbed on the corrosion products of Fe 0 and could be desorbed by leaching with a carbonate solution. The study also showed that the reduced U(IV) species on Fe 0 surfaces could be reoxidized and potentially remobilized when the reduced system becomes more oxidized. Results of this research support the application of the permeable reactive barrier technology using Fe 0 as a reactive media to intercept U and other groundwater contaminants migrating to the tributaries of Bear Creek at the U.S. Department of Energy's Y-12 Plant located in Oak Ridge, TN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: