This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The reversible intercalation of multivalent cations, especially Mg 2+, into a solid-state electrode is an attractive mechanism for next-generation energy storage devices. These reactions typically exhibit poor kinetics due to a high activation energy for interfacial charge-transfer and slow solid-state diffusion. Interlayer water in V 2 O 5 and MnO 2 has been shown to improve Mg 2+ intercalation kinetics in nonaqueous electrolytes. Here, the effect of structural water on Mg 2+ intercalation in nonaqueous electrolytes is examined in crystalline WO 3 and the related hydrated and layered WO 3 · n H 2 O ( n = 1, 2). Using thin film electrodes, cyclic voltammetry, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and electron microscopy, the energy storage in these materials is determined to involve reversible Mg 2+ intercalation. It is found that the anhydrous WO 3 can intercalate up to ∼0.3 Mg 2+ (75 mAh g –1 ) and can maintain the monoclinic structure for at least 50 cycles at a cyclic voltammetry sweep rate of 0.1 mV s –1 . The kinetics of Mg 2+ storage in WO 3 are limited by solid-state diffusion, which is similar to its behavior in a Li + electrolyte. On the other hand, the maximum capacity for Mg 2+ storage in WO 3 · n H 2 O is approximately half that of WO 3 (35 mAh g –1 ). However, the kinetics of both Mg 2+ and Li + storage in WO 3 · n H 2 O are primarily limited by the interface and are thus pseudocapacitive. The stability of the structural water in WO 3 · n H 2 O varies: the interlayer water of WO 3 ·2H 2 O is removed upon exposure to a nonaqueous electrolyte, while the water directly coordinated to W is stable during electrochemical cycling. These results demonstrate that tungsten oxides are potential candidates for Mg 2+ cathodes, that in these materials structural water can lead to improved Mg 2+ kinetics at the expense of capacity, and that the type of structural water affects stability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: