Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sr3In(PO4)3 (SIP):Ce3+/Tb3+/Mn2+ phosphors have been prepared via a solid state reaction process. Under UV excitation, there are three energy transfer (ET) pairs in the SIP host, i.e., Ce3+ → Tb3+, Ce3+ → Mn2+, and Tb3+ → Mn2+. Both of the ETs from Ce3+ to Tb3+ and from Ce3+ to Mn2+ in the SIP host have been demonstrated to be resonant type via a dipole–quadrupole mechanism, and the critical distance (RC) calculated by the quenching concentration method and spectral overlap method, respectively, were investigated. By the ET of Ce3+ → Tb3+, Ce3+ → Mn2+, and Tb3+ → Mn2+ the emitting colors of the studied samples could be adjusted from blue to green, from blue to orange-red, and from green to green-yellow, respectively. More importantly, under low-voltage electron beam excitation, the CL spectra of the SIP:Ce3+, Mn2+ samples cover the whole visible light region, resulting in a white light emission. Additionally, the CL properties of SIP:Ce3+/Tb3+/Mn2+ phosphors have been investigated in detail. The results reveal that the as-prepared phosphors have good CL intensity and CIE coordinate stability under electron beam bombardment. Compared with the commercial green phosphor ZnO:Zn, SIP:7% Ce3+, the 10% Tb3+ sample has a higher CL brightness. In conclusion, tunable light with high quantum yield (68%) has been obtained in SIP:Ce3+/Tb3+/Mn2+ phosphors by utilizing the principle of energy transfer and properly selecting the activator contents under UV and electron beam excitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: