Key result
Implementation of a computerized clinical decision support module reduced overall inappropriate medication administration non-significantly (6.3% vs 13.3%, p=0.054) but eliminated enoxaparin use.
Why the study?
Does a computerized clinical decision support module reduce inappropriate medication administration in adult patients receiving epidural anesthesia?
Cohort (n=376)
No
Does a computerized clinical decision support module reduce inappropriate medication administration in adult patients receiving epidural anesthesia?
Implementation of a computerized clinical decision support module in the CPOE system can eliminate the administration of high-risk medications like enoxaparin during epidural therapy.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open targeted CDS benefits for eliminating inappropriate enoxaparin.
Background: The use of epidural anesthesia has been shown to improve outcomes in the postoperative setting. To minimize risk of complications, avoiding certain medications with epidural anesthesia is advised. Objective: This study sought to determine the role of a computerized clinical decision support module implemented into the computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system on the incidence of administration of medications known to increase complications with epidural anesthesia. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort chart review in adult patients receiving epidural anesthesia for at least 1 day. Patients were identified retrospectively and divided into 2 cohorts, those receiving an epidural 3 months prior to initiation of the module and those receiving an epidural 3 months following implementation. The primary end point was incidence of inappropriate medication administration before and after implementation. Complications of therapy were collected as secondary end points. Results: There was a reduction in the incidence of inappropriate medication administration in the postimplementation group versus the preimplementation group (6.3% vs 12.8%) although statistical significance was not achieved. In addition, the incidence of enoxaparin administration was significantly lower postimplementation than the preimplementation (0% vs 3.9%). There were no significant differences in other complications of therapy. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that application of decision support for this high-risk procedural population was able to eliminate the incidence of the most common inappropriate medication for epidural analgesia, enoxaparin. A reduction in incidence of other inappropriate medications was also observed; however, statistical significance was not reached. The use of computerized clinical decision support can be a powerful tool in reducing or ameliorating medication errors, and further study will be required to determine the most appropriate and effective implementation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pouliot et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Epidural anesthesia (n=376). Computerized clinical decision support module vs. Preimplementation (no decision support module) was evaluated on Incidence of inappropriate medication administration (p=0.054). Implementation of a computerized clinical decision support module reduced overall inappropriate medication administration non-significantly (6.3% vs 13.3%, p=0.054) but eliminated enoxaparin use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: