Key result
A 30-40 s maximal inspiratory breath-hold to increase muscle sympathetic activity caused no significant changes in the discharge of 37 muscle spindle afferents compared with rest.
Why the study?
Does physiological activation of muscle sympathetic outflow modulate the resting discharge of human muscle spindles?
Observational (n=10)
Does physiological activation of muscle sympathetic outflow modulate the resting discharge of human muscle spindles?
A sustained, physiological increase in muscle sympathetic activity causes no detectable change in human muscle spindle firing, challenging the concept that the sympathetic nervous system directly influences their sensitivity.
No modulation of spindle discharge by physiological sympathetic activation; leaves open direct sympathetic effects on sensitivity in health or disease.
There is evidence in experimental animals that, in addition to receiving fusimotor drive, muscle spindles are subject to modulation by the sympathetic nervous system. We examined the validity of this idea in human subjects by recording from muscle spindles in the relaxed ankle and toe extensor muscles during a strong and sustained physiological activation of muscle sympathetic outflow. Unitary recordings were made from 20 primary and 17 secondary muscle spindle afferents via a tungsten microelectrode inserted percutaneously into the peroneal nerve in 10 awake, healthy subjects seated with the legs supported in the extended position. ECG, blood pressure, respiration and calf circumference were also recorded. The majority of the muscle spindles were spontaneously active at rest; a background discharge was induced in four silent spindles by vibrating the tendon. A sustained increase in muscle vasoconstrictor activity, an increase in calf volume and a fall in pulse pressure were produced by subjects performing a 30-40 s maximal inspiratory breath-hold. Despite this strong increase in muscle sympathetic outflow no significant changes occurred in the discharge of either primary or secondary muscle spindle afferents, measured as a change in mean frequency and variability over sequential 5 s epochs and compared with the preceding period of rest. Strong chemoreceptor-driven sympathetic bursts during sustained expiratory breath-holds also failed to modulate the firing of 14 spindle endings. We conclude that a sustained, physiological increase in muscle sympathetic activity causes no detectable change in muscle spindle firing, lending no support to the concept that the sympathetic nervous system can influence the sensitivity of human muscle spindles directly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macefield et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=10). Physiological activation of muscle sympathetic outflow (breath-holds) vs. Rest was evaluated on Change in mean frequency and variability of muscle spindle afferent discharge. A 30-40 s maximal inspiratory breath-hold to increase muscle sympathetic activity caused no significant changes in the discharge of 37 muscle spindle afferents compared with rest.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: