Key result
Intravenous dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the incidence of emergence agitation at 10 minutes post-extubation (10.0% vs 40.0%, p<0.001) in elderly patients undergoing lithotripsy.
Why the study?
The objective was to determine whether remifentanil-propofol combined with dexmedetomidine during general anesthesia decreases postoperative emergence agitation, anxiety, and depression without affecting cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients.
Does dexmedetomidine added to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia reduce postoperative emergence agitation, anxiety, depression, and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy?
RCT (n=120)
Double-blind
Sealed envelopes
No
Does dexmedetomidine added to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia reduce postoperative emergence agitation, anxiety, depression, and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy?
Intraoperative dexmedetomidine reduces postoperative emergence agitation, anxiety, and depression, and decreases propofol and remifentanil requirements, without affecting postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing lithotripsy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dexmedetomidine adjunct to cut emergence agitation, anxiety, and anesthetic doses in elderly lithotripsy patients; extends RCT evidence on recovery without cognitive impact.
BACKGROUNDClinical study indicated that infusion of dexmedetomidine without loading dose intraoperative provided smooth and haemodynamically stable emergence, and improved quality of recovery with fewer postoperative side effects and analgesic requirements 9 . The objective is to determine remifentanil-propofol combined with dexmedetomidine during general anesthesia would decrease the incidence and severity of postoperative emergence agitation, anxiety and depression, and without effect on the cognitive dysfunction in elder patients.METHODS120 elder patients scheduled for ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy were randomly allocated to PR group administered the normal saline, and PRD group administered dexmedetomidine 0.4 µg.Kg -1 .h -1 intravenously after induction of anesthesia, and stopped 30 minutes before the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the scores of richmond agitation sedation, mini mental state examination, state-trait anxiety inventory, zung self-Rating depression scale, and the arabic numeral memory. The secondary outcome was the duration of surgery, and time to spontaneous respiration, recovery and extubation.RESULTSThe dosage of propofol and remifentanil decreased more significantly in PRD group ( P< 0.001). The RASS scores in the PRD group was significantly lower than in PR group at t 1-3 ( P< 0.001). The MMSE scores were lower at T 1 - 2 in two groups ( P< 0.001). Compared to PR group, the ZSDS scores and STAI scores at T 1 - 2 were lower in PRD group ( P <0.005). The recalled arabic numbers were lower at T 2 in PR group ( P< 0.001).CONCLUSIONDexmedetomidine administration could reduce both the dosage of remifentanil and propofol during surgery, and the incidence and severity of postoperative emergence agitation, anxiety and depression in elderly patients.Trial registrationthe Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900021254, Registered 3 February 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR1900021254.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (n=120). Dexmedetomidine vs. Normal saline (placebo) was evaluated on Incidence of emergence agitation at 10 minutes after extubation (p=<0.001). Intravenous dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the incidence of emergence agitation at 10 minutes post-extubation (10.0% vs 40.0%, p<0.001) in elderly patients undergoing lithotripsy.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: