Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study uncovers exclusionary inclusion practices among First Nations art market intermediaries, suggesting that strategic exclusion can foster safer decolonial spaces.
Marketplaces are exclusionary structures that reify and exacerbate power hierarchies. In many contemporary marketplaces, one of the power hierarchies that structures marketplace exclusion is colonialism. Drawing on Borderwork as a decolonial perspective and data collected on the First Nations art markets in Australia, we explore market exclusion as a form of decolonial resistance, reclamation and reassertion. We show how First Nations artists and intermediaries draw on practices nominally associated with market exclusion to carve out inclusionary spaces within settler colonial market structures. In theorising exclusionary inclusion , we document First Nations artists and intermediaries as border makers and maintainers—and theorise how exclusionary tactics can serve as border-making and enforcing—all towards a goal of fomenting a safer and more inclusive marketplace. We thus put forward an exploration of how decolonisation lenses afford a novel relational view into the dynamic and complex nature of marketplace exclusion, power hierarchies, and inclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: