Key result
Combining PVAT and aortic radiomics with clinical features aids NCCT detection of aortic dissection.
Why the study?
NCCT has limited sensitivity for diagnosing aortic dissection, and the diagnostic contribution and incremental value of PVAT radiomics beyond aortic radiomics remain unclear.
Does adding perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) radiomics to aortic radiomics improve the detection of aortic dissection on non-contrast CT?
Observational
Yes
Does adding perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) radiomics to aortic radiomics improve the detection of aortic dissection on non-contrast CT?
Aortic radiomics on non-contrast CT provide strong diagnostic performance for detecting aortic dissection, while the addition of perivascular adipose tissue radiomics offers limited incremental value.
May enhance NCCT AD detection but should not alter practice; leaves open prospective validation of PVAT-radiomics models.
Aortic dissection (AD) requires prompt diagnosis, but non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) has limited sensitivity. Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) may reflect vascular inflammation; however, its diagnostic contribution on NCCT and incremental value beyond aortic radiomics remain unclear. This retrospective multicenter study included 581 patients from one center for model development and internal testing and 280 patients from three external cohorts. Six models (Clinical, Aorta, PVAT, Aorta-PVAT, Aorta-Clinical, and Aorta-PVAT-Clinical) were evaluated using support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forest (RF) classifiers. In internal testing, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.876-0.895 for Aorta models, 0.727-0.764 for PVAT models, and 0.873-0.895 for Aorta-PVAT models. Corresponding external AUCs were 0.898-0.921, 0.809-0.866, and 0.896-0.908, respectively. Aorta models significantly outperformed the corresponding PVAT models internally. Across classifiers, adding PVAT radiomics did not consistently improve discrimination or decision-curve net benefit over Aorta models and did not improve Aorta-Clinical models. Feature-importance analyses likewise showed stronger contributions from aortic radiomic and clinical variables than from PVAT features in combined models. Aortic radiomics provided the dominant NCCT imaging signal for AD detection and generalized well across centers. PVAT radiomics showed independent but weaker discrimination and limited incremental value beyond aortic radiomics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Aortic Dissection. Perivascular Adipose Tissue Radiomics was evaluated on Detection of Aortic Dissection. Radiomic features of the aorta and perivascular adipose tissue, along with clinical features like age, D-dimer, and platelet count, demonstrated varying impacts on the model output for detecting aortic dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: