Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The concept of "needs " is currently driving much of the developmental and evaluative effort in education. Needs as-sessments are mandated by virtually every federally and state funded program as the basis for planning, for developing inter-ventions presumably responsive to the dis-covered needs, and for assessing the ulti-mate impact or utility of those interven-tions. The difficulty, as we see it, with the current conception of needs assessment is that apparently it is based on the implicit assumption that needs are objectively "real " and open to discovery by appropri-ate scientific (value-free) methodologies.1 They are presumed, therefore, to have some legitimate, "natural " claim on energy and resources independent of judgments that individual people may bring to bear about their relevance or appropriateness. They can no more be denied than the self-evident needs for air, food, or water. We proceed on the contrary assumption that needs have no objective reality; they can be discovered only through a value-1 That science is not value free is beyond doubt. An extensive literature showing how science is value
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guba et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: