Why the study?
Does ivabradine or metoprolol improve autonomic imbalance in a human model of cardiac sympathetic activation?
RCT (n=19)
Double-blind
Crossover
Does ivabradine or metoprolol improve autonomic imbalance in a human model of cardiac sympathetic activation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a human model of sympathetic activation, ivabradine attenuates sympathetic influences on heart rate at the sinus node but leaves myocardial sympathetic activation unopposed, unlike metoprolol.
Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated 4 (HCN4) channels comprise the final pathway for autonomic heart rate (HR) regulation. We hypothesized that HCN4 inhibition could reverse autonomic imbalance in a human model of cardiac sympathetic activation. Nineteen healthy men ingested oral metoprolol+reboxetine, ivabradine+reboxetine, or placebo+reboxetine in a double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion. We assessed HR, blood pressure (BP), stroke volume, and cardiac output during rest and profound orthostatic stress. HR variability, BP variability, and baroreflex sensitivity were analyzed. Metoprolol, but not ivabradine, decreased resting HR and BP. Ivabradine attenuated the HR increase to orthostatic stress, albeit to a lesser extent than metoprolol. Stroke volume and cardiac output at a given HR were significantly lower with metoprolol. Unlike metoprolol, ivabradine did not affect HR variability, BP variability, or baroreflex sensitivity. Ivabradine attenuates sympathetic influences on HR at the sinus node level, leaving myocardial sympathetic activation unopposed. Reversal of parasympathetic dysfunction by ivabradine appears limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schroeder et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=19). Ivabradine + reboxetine and Metoprolol + reboxetine vs. Placebo + reboxetine was evaluated on Heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume, and cardiac output during rest and profound orthostatic stress.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: