Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: We determined the safety and efficacy of holmium:YAG lithotripsy in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all holmium:YAG lithotripsy done in patients 17 years old or younger. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 9 boys and 10 girls (26 stones) with a mean age of 11 years (range 1 to 17) were treated with holmium:YAG lithotripsy, which was chosen as initial therapy in 10 (53%). Retrograde ureteroscopy was performed in 15 patients to treat 13 ureteral and 6 renal calculi, and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was done in 4 to treat 3 ureteral and 4 renal calculi. A complete stone-free outcome after 1 procedure was achieved in 16 children (84%) and 3 patients were rendered stone-free after 2 procedures. No patient had an intraoperative injury. Followup ranged from 0.5 to 12 months (mean 3). Followup imaging has shown no evidence of stricture or hydronephrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium:YAG lithotripsy is safe and effective in children. It is a reasonable option for failed shock wave lithotripsy, or in children with a known durile stone composition or contraindications to shock wave lithotripsy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wollin et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: