Key result
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was a superior predictor of 30-day adverse outcomes (HR 0.77) compared to tricuspid annular systolic velocity in acute pulmonary embolism.
Why the study?
Is TV S' superior to TAPSE for predicting 30-day adverse outcomes in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=139)
No
Is TV S' superior to TAPSE for predicting 30-day adverse outcomes in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Hazard Ratio: 0.77 (95% CI 0.67–0.89)
p-value: p=<0.001
In normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism, TAPSE is superior to TV S' for predicting 30-day adverse outcomes.
May support TAPSE over TV S' for 30-day risk prediction in normotensive acute PE; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is an established index of right ventricular (RV) systolic function and a significant predictor in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). Recently, Doppler tissue imaging-derived tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TV S'), a modern parameter of RV function was reported to be useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of a broad spectrum of heart diseases. Therefore, herein, is an analysis of the prognostic value of both parameters in normotensive PE patients. METHODS: One hundred and thirty nine consecutive PE patients (76 female, age 56.4 ± 19.5 years) were included in this study. All patients were initially anticoagulated. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on admission. The study endpoint (SE) was defined as PE-related 30-day mortality and/or need for rescue thrombolysis. RESULTS: Seven (5%) patients who met the criteria for SE presented more severe RV dysfunction at echocardiography. Univariable Cox regression analysis showed that RV/LV ratio predicted SE with hazard risk (HR) 10.6 (1.4-80.0; p = 0.02); TAPSE and TV S' showed HR 0.77 (0.67-0.89), p < 0.001, and 0.71 (0.52-0.97), p = 0.03, respectively. Area under the curve for TAPSE in the prediction of SE was 0.881; 95% CI 0.812-0.932, p = 0.0001, for TV S' was 0.751; 95% CI 0.670-0.820, p = 0.001. Multivariable analysis showed that the optimal prediction model included TAPSE and systolic blood pressure (SBP showed HR 0.89 95% CI 0.83-0.95, p < 0.001 and TAPSE HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.87, p<0.03). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that initially PE patients with TAPSE ≥ 18 mm had a much more favorable prognosis that patients with TAPSE < 18 mm (p < 0.01), while analysis of S' was only of borderline statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that TV S' is inferior to TAPSE for 30 day prediction of adverse outcome in acute pulmonary embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurnicka et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=139). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) vs. Tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TV S') was evaluated on 30-day PE-related mortality and/or need for rescue thrombolysis (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.89, p=<0.001). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was a superior predictor of 30-day adverse outcomes (HR 0.77) compared to tricuspid annular systolic velocity in acute pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: