Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enantioselective electrophilic substitutions with Michael acceptors and alkylating agents at the α-positions of γ- and δ-lactams are presented. The asymmetric Michael addition of lactam 1a to nitroalkenes 2 was used as the key step for the synthesis, over three steps, of α-(β-aminoalkyl)-γ-lactams 5 in good overall yields (37−61%) and with very good diastereomeric and enantiomeric excesses (de ⩾ 96%, ee = 82 to ⩾ 96%). Conjugate addition to alkenylsulfones 6a and 6b afforded Michael adducts 7a and 7b in good yields, but with only moderate diastereoselectivities (de = 38−41%). α-Substituted N-dialkylamino lactams 9a−c were obtained by asymmetric alkylation of N-(dialkylamino)lactam 1a with functionalised electrophiles 8a−c in good yields (66−84%) and with moderate to excellent diastereomeric excesses (66 to ⩾ 96%). The auxiliary was removed by reductive N−N bond cleavage to afford the lactam 10 (ee = 83%). A second alkylation of α-alkylated d N-(dialkylamino)lactams 11 yielded α-disubstituted γ-butyrolactams (12a, 12b) in good yields and diastereomeric excesses (de = 83−88%) and α-disubstituted δ-valerolactams (12c−e) in good yields but with low to moderate diastereoselectivities (de = 6−52%). The α-silylated γ-lactam 15 was obtained in good yield (53% over two steps) and with an enantiomeric excess of 83% by α-silylation of N-(dialkylamino)lactam 1a and subsequent reductive removal of the auxiliary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enders et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: