Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The magnesium complexes L 2 Mg i Pr (L 2 = 4- tert -butyl-6-(triphenylsilyl)-2-[bis((3-(dimethylamino)propyl)amino)methyl]phenoxyl) and L 3 Mg i Pr (L 3 = 4- tert -butyl-6-(triphenylsilyl)-2-[benzyl((3-(dimethylamino)propyl)amino)methyl]phenoxyl) supported by potentially tetradentate and tridentate triphenylsilyl-substituted phenoxyamine ligands have been prepared and fully characterized. The X-ray crystallographic analysis of L 2 Mg i Pr confirmed a monomeric structure in which only one of the amine side arms is bound to the four-coordinate magnesium atom. The free and coordinated side arms in L 2 Mg i Pr undergo an exchange process at 25 °C in solution, while the phenoxydiamine complex L 3 Mg i Pr, on the other hand, shows no sign of fluxionality. Both complexes, as well as L 1 Mg i Pr (L 1 = 4,6-di- tert -butyl-2-[bis((3-(dimethylamino)propyl)amino)methyl]phenoxyl), were shown to be competent catalysts in the cyclization of aminoalkenes. L 2 Mg i Pr exhibited the best catalytic activity, and both triphenylsilyl-substituted complexes display zero-order rate dependence on substrate concentration and first-order rate dependence on catalyst concentration, whereas the sterically less hindered complex L 1 Mg i Pr exhibits second-order rate dependence on substrate concentration. No Schlenk-type ligand redistributions were observed, and the catalytically active magnesium species was stable after prolonged heating to 120 °C, according to an NMR spectroscopic study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: