Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Integrase of the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) recognizes specific sequences located in the U3 and U5 regions at the ends of viral DNA. We synthesized DNA duplexes mimicking the U5 region and containing either 2'-aminonucleosides or non-nucleoside 1,3-propanediol insertions at the third and terminal positions and studied their interactions with HIV-1 integrase. Both modifications introduced a local structural distortion in the DNA double helix. Replacement of the terminal nucleosides by corresponding 2'-aminonucleosides had no significant effect on integrase activity. We used an integrase substrate bearing terminal 2'-aminonucleosides in both strands to synthesize a duplex with cross-linked strands. This duplex was then used to determine whether terminal base pair disruption is an obligatory step of retroviral DNA 3'-processing. Processing of the cross-linked analog of the integrase substrate yielded a product of the same length as 3'-processing of the wild-type substrate but the reaction efficiency was lower. Replacement of the third adenosine in the processed strand by a corresponding 2'-aminonucleoside did not affect integrase activity, whereas, its replacement by 1,3-propanediol completely inhibited 3'-processing. Both modifications of the complementary thymidine in the nonprocessed strand increased the initial rate of 3'-processing. The same effect was observed when both nucleosides, at the third position, were replaced by corresponding 2'-aminonucleosides. This indicates that the local duplex distortion facilitated the cleavage of the phosphodiester bond. Thus, a localized destabilization of the third A-T base pair is necessary for efficient 3'-processing, whereas 3'-end-fraying is important but not absolutely required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agapkina et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: