Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary. A study of the psychrotrophic bacterial content, determined at 3–5°, of soil, grass and hay showed that these habitats were prolific sources of many different types of psychrotrophs, which sometimes exceeded 10 7 /g. Untreated farm water supplies had a much lower content, few samples giving colony counts > 10 4 /ml. Gram positive or Gram variable, nonsporeforming rods, resembling coryneform bacteria, constituted a relatively high proportion of the psychrotrophic microflora of soil, Gram negative rods only forming about 1/3 of the isolates. In contrast, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. and yellow or orange pigmented Gram negative rods were the predominant psychrotrophs in untreated water. Pseudomonas and a taxonomically heterogeneous group of yellow pigmented, Gram negative rods, a few of which resembled Flavobacterium and some Erwinia herbicola , together with Acinetobacter accounted for nearly 90% of the isolates from grass, but < 50% of those from hay, which had a more complex psychrotrophic microflora than had grass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Druce et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: