Key result
Vector concentration obtained with transverse oscillation showed a very strong correlation with digital subtraction angiography for stenosis assessment (R = 0.93, p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Assessing SFA stenosis with Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency, and DSA requires ionizing radiation, making angle-independent transverse oscillation vector flow imaging a potential alternative.
Does vector flow imaging based on transverse oscillation accurately assess superficial femoral artery stenosis compared to digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic limb ischemia?
Cross-Sectional (n=11)
Blinded evaluators
No
Does vector flow imaging based on transverse oscillation accurately assess superficial femoral artery stenosis compared to digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic limb ischemia?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vector flow imaging using transverse oscillation to measure flow complexity (vector concentration) correlates strongly with digital subtraction angiography for grading superficial femoral artery stenosis, outperforming standard velocity ratio measurements.
PURPOSE: Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) induces complex blood flow with increased velocities. Disease assessment is performed with Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), but Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency and DSA by ionizing radiation. An alternative is the vector flow imaging method based on transverse oscillation (TO), an angle-independent vector velocity technique using ultrasound. In this study, flow complexity and velocity measured with TO were compared with DSA for the assessment of stenosis in the SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vector concentration, a measure of flow complexity, and the velocity ratio obtained from the stenosis and a disease-free adjacent vessel segment, were estimated with TO in 11 patients with a total of 16 stenoses of the SFA. TO data were compared with the corresponding stenosis degree percentage obtained with DSA. RESULTS: The correlation between the vector concentration and DSA was very strong (R=0.93; p<0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.98), while only moderate for velocity ratio and DSA (R=0.50; p<0.07; 95% CI: 0.00-0.80). The correlation coefficients that were found were significantly different (p<0.005) without overlapping CI. CONCLUSION: The study indicated that flow changes in the SFA induced by stenosis can be quantified with TO, and that stenosis grading may be improved by estimation of flow complexity instead of velocity ratio. TO is a potential diagnostic tool for the assessment of atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) in chronic limb ischemia (n=11). Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) using transverse oscillation (TO) vs. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) was evaluated on Correlation between vector concentration and DSA stenosis degree percentage (R = 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-0.98, p=<0.001). Vector concentration obtained with transverse oscillation showed a very strong correlation with digital subtraction angiography for stenosis assessment (R = 0.93, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: