Key result
Thoracic epidural anesthesia did not alter the hemodynamic changes induced by hypercapnia compared with general anesthesia alone.
Why the study?
Does thoracic epidural anesthesia alter the hemodynamic changes induced by hypercapnia during general anesthesia?
Does thoracic epidural anesthesia alter the hemodynamic changes induced by hypercapnia during general anesthesia?
Extensive thoracic epidural block does not blunt the hemodynamic responses to hypercapnia during general anesthesia, suggesting some sympathetic nerve fibers escape the block.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support relying on thoracic epidural anesthesia to blunt hypercapnic responses; hypothesis-generating for sympathetic fiber escape.
Objective: Many studies have demonstrated that carbon dioxide has direct depressive effects on the myocardium and dilates the vascular bed. However, it leads to an increase in arterial blood pressure and cardiac output because of sympathetic stimulating effect. Extensive epidural block may impair the sympathetic innervation to the heart as well as to the adrenal gland. The present study was set up in order to investigate how an extensive epidural block would affect the hemodynamic response to sympathetic stimulation induced by hypercapnia. Methods: Twenty patients were mechanically ventilated under general anesthesia after epidural catheter insertion on T6–T7 intervertebral space. Hypercapnia was obtained by CO2 breathing. PaCO2 (partial pressure of CO2, arterial) was adjusted to 30, 45, and 60 mm Hg with each concentration being maintained for 10 minutes. In each period, hemodynamic variables were monitored by pulmonary artery catheter. After returning to normocarbia for 15 minutes, 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected epidurally and PaCO2 was adjusted in the same manner, and then, the hemodynamic variables of each period were checked. Results: There were no changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate by hypercapnia after combined epidural anesthesia compared with general anesthesia only. Hypercapnia increased cardiac output and cardiac index. Systemic vascular resistance was decreased significantly. Pulmonary artery pressure was increased but not significantly. The degrees of hemodynamic changes were similar between in general anesthesia alone and in combined epidural anesthesia. Conclusion: In spite of an extensive epidural block, hemodynamic changes induced by hypercarbnia were not changed. There are some ‘escaped’ sympathetic nerve fibers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoo et al. (2016) studied Patients under general anesthesia (n=20). Thoracic epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine) vs. General anesthesia alone was evaluated on Hemodynamic changes induced by hypercapnia. Thoracic epidural anesthesia did not alter the hemodynamic changes induced by hypercapnia compared with general anesthesia alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: