Key result
Diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by supervised physician assistants had a similar incidence of major complications within 24 hours compared to cardiology fellows (0.54% vs 0.58%).
Why the study?
Does diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by supervised physician assistants result in similar complication rates compared to supervised cardiology fellows in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Population
Patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization with coronary angiography
Comparison
Diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by… vs Diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
24 hours
Authors
Loading...
Supports similar safety of supervised PAs for diagnostic catheterization; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before broader adoption.
Cohort
Does diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by supervised physician assistants result in similar complication rates compared to supervised cardiology fellows in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.54% vs 0.58%
Trained and supervised physician assistants can perform diagnostic cardiac catheterization with similar safety and efficiency to cardiology fellows-in-training.
Krasuski et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by supervised physician assistants vs. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by supervised cardiology fellows-in-training was evaluated on Major complications within 24 hr of the procedure. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization performed by supervised physician assistants had a similar incidence of major complications within 24 hours compared to cardiology fellows (0.54% vs 0.58%).