Key result
Novel oral anticoagulants offer an alternative to warfarin for patients at risk of thromboembolic events, overcoming limitations like the need for monitoring and dose adjustment.
Why the study?
Do novel oral anticoagulants provide safe and effective alternatives to warfarin in patients at risk for thromboembolic events?
Do novel oral anticoagulants provide safe and effective alternatives to warfarin in patients at risk for thromboembolic events?
This review summarizes the emerging evidence for novel oral anticoagulants as alternatives to warfarin in patients at risk for thromboembolic events.
Long-term anticoagulation with warfarin is the mainstay of treatment in patients with diseases with high thromboembolic potential, such as atrial fibrillation. However, warfarin therapy carries a number of inherent limitations, including slow onset and offset of action, interindividual variability, food and drug interactions, lack of selectivity and a narrow therapeutic window. Recently developed oral anticoagulants that selectively block key factors in the coagulation cascade, with no need for monitoring or dose adjustment, have the potential to replace warfarin in clinical practice. The safety and efficacy of these agents in patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolisms and acute coronary syndromes have been the object of numerous recent large-scale clinical investigations. This article provides an overview of the evidence currently available on the use of novel, orally available, selective anticoagulants in patients at risk for thromboembolic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capodanno et al. (2012) conducted a review in Thromboembolic events (e.g., atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolisms, acute coronary syndromes). Novel oral anticoagulants vs. Warfarin was evaluated. Novel oral anticoagulants offer an alternative to warfarin for patients at risk of thromboembolic events, overcoming limitations like the need for monitoring and dose adjustment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: