Key result
General anesthesia resulted in significantly greater retention of infused fluid in the circulation compared to epidural anesthesia (47% vs 29%; P<0.001), triggered by a greater decrease in MAP.
Why the study?
Does general anesthesia compared to epidural anesthesia alter the dynamics of vascular volume and hemodilution of lactated Ringer's solution?
Observational (n=53)
Does general anesthesia compared to epidural anesthesia alter the dynamics of vascular volume and hemodilution of lactated Ringer's solution?
General anesthesia causes more hemodilution and volume expansion than epidural anesthesia during lactated Ringer's infusion, driven by a greater reduction in mean arterial pressure.
General anesthesia may retain more infused fluid than epidural; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dynamics of vascular volume and the plasma dilution of lactated Ringer's solution in patients during the induction of general and epidural anesthesia. METHODS: The hemodilution of i.v. infusion of 1000 ml of lactated Ringer's solution over 60 min was studied in patients undergoing general (n=31) and epidural (n=22) anesthesia. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure and hemoglobin (Hb) concentration were measured every 5 min during the study. Surgery was not started until the study period had been completed. RESULTS: General anesthesia caused the greater decrease of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (mean 15% versus 9%; P<0.01) and thereby followed by a more pronounced plasma dilution, blood volume expansion (VE) and blood volume expansion efficiency (VEE). A strong linear correlation between hemodilution and the reduction in MAP (r=-0.50; P<0.01) was found. At the end of infusion, patients undergoing general anesthesia retained 47% (SD 19%) of the infused fluid in the circulation, while epidural anesthesia retained 29% (SD 13%) (P<0.001). Correspondingly, a fewer urine output (mean 89 ml versus 156 ml; P<0.05) and extravascular expansion (454 ml versus 551 ml; P<0.05) were found during general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the induction of general anesthesia caused more hemodilution, volume expansion and volume expansion efficiency than epidural anesthesia, which was triggered only by the lower MAP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing anesthesia (n=53). General anesthesia vs. Epidural anesthesia was evaluated on Fluid retention in the circulation at the end of infusion (p=<0.001). General anesthesia resulted in significantly greater retention of infused fluid in the circulation compared to epidural anesthesia (47% vs 29%; P<0.001), triggered by a greater decrease in MAP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: