Key result
Low radiation dose LV multi-phase rotational angiography was feasible and highly accurate compared to biplane LV angiography, with 95% of contour distances <4 mm.
Why the study?
Does multi-phase rotational angiography (4DRA) provide accurate dynamic left ventricular models compared to biplane LV angiography in patients undergoing left-sided ablation?
Observational (n=11)
Does multi-phase rotational angiography (4DRA) provide accurate dynamic left ventricular models compared to biplane LV angiography in patients undergoing left-sided ablation?
Multi-phase rotational angiography of the left ventricle is feasible at near-physiological heart rates with acceptable radiation dose and high accuracy, potentially improving dynamic anatomical guidance during ablations.
Supports low-dose 4DRA for LV imaging in ablation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
AIMS: Interventional left ventricular (LV) procedures integrating static 3D anatomy visualization are subject to mismatch with dynamic catheter movements due to prominent LV motion. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a recently developed acquisition and post-processing protocol for low radiation dose LV multi-phase rotational angiography (4DRA) in patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: 4DRA image acquisition of the LV was performed as investigational acquisition in patients undergoing left-sided ablation (11 men; BMI = 24.7 ± 2.5 kg/m²). Iodine contrast was injected in the LA, while pacing from the RA at a cycle length of 700 ms. 4DRA acquisition and reconstruction were possible in all 11 studies. Reconstructed images were post-processed using streak artefact reduction algorithms and an interphase registration-based filtering method, increasing contrast-to-noise ratio by a factor 8.2 ± 2.1. This enabled semi-automatic segmentation, yielding LV models of five equidistant phases per cardiac cycle. For evaluation, off-line 4DRA fluoroscopy registration was performed, and the 4DRA LV contours of the different phases were compared with the contours of five corresponding phases of biplane LV angiography, acquired in identical circumstances. Of the distances between these contours, 95% were <4 mm in both incidences. Effective radiation dose for 4DRA, calculated by patient-specific Monte-Carlo simulation, was 5.1 ± 1.1 mSv. CONCLUSION: Creation of 4DRA LV models in man is feasible at near-physiological heart rate and with clinically acceptable radiation dose. They showed high accuracy with respect to LV angiography in RAO and LAO. The presented technology not only opens perspectives for full cardiac cycle dynamic anatomical guidance during interventional procedures, but also for 3DRA without need for very rapid pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wielandts et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing left-sided ablation (n=11). Low radiation dose LV multi-phase rotational angiography (4DRA) vs. Biplane LV angiography was evaluated on Distance between 4DRA LV contours and biplane LV angiography contours. Low radiation dose LV multi-phase rotational angiography was feasible and highly accurate compared to biplane LV angiography, with 95% of contour distances <4 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: