Key result
Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole more frequently resulted in optimal 3D image quality compared to rapid right ventricular pacing (42% vs 11%, P=0.01) during cardiac ablation.
Why the study?
Does adenosine-induced ventricular asystole improve 3D image quality compared to rapid ventricular pacing during rotational angiography for cardiac ablation?
Observational (n=40)
Does adenosine-induced ventricular asystole improve 3D image quality compared to rapid ventricular pacing during rotational angiography for cardiac ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 42% vs 11%
p-value: p=0.01
Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole provides superior optimal 3D image quality compared to rapid ventricular pacing during rotational angiography for cardiac ablation procedures by eliminating cardiac motion artefacts.
Adenosine may improve 3D rotational angiography quality versus pacing in ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
AIMS: Rotational angiography with digital three-dimensional reconstruction (3DRA) allows per-procedural 3D imaging to facilitate cardiac ablation procedures. We developed a new approach that allows per-procedural 3D imaging of the atria and ventricles with a single C-arm rotation, combining higher 3D image quality with a lower contrast and radiation dose. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients underwent 3DRA of the left atrium (LA, n = 26), right atrium (RA, n = 11), left ventricle (LV, n = 2), or right ventricle (RV, n = 1) during ablation procedures performed under general anaesthesia. Contrast agent (60 +/- 12 mL) was diluted and injected directly in the chamber of interest, during adenosine-induced ventricular asystole (n = 31) or rapid RV pacing (n = 9, atrial imaging only) to reduce cardiac motion artefacts and enhance contrast opacification during rotational imaging. Reconstructed 3D data sets were graded according to predefined quality criteria (n = 40) and quantitatively compared with cardiac computed tomography (CT) (LA, n = 14). Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole and rapid pacing both allowed a sustained and homogeneous contrast opacification of target cardiac chambers, resulting in useful 3D data sets in 39 of 40 (98%) patients. Moreover, it was possible to achieve 'good' or 'optimal' 3D image quality in the majority of patients (adenosine: 61%, pacing 78%, P = 0.69). When compared with rapid pacing, the total elimination of cardiac motion artefacts with adenosine more frequently resulted in 'optimal' 3D image quality (42% vs. 11%, P = 0.01) and added the possibility for single-rotation 3D imaging of the ventricles. Quantitative analysis showed an excellent agreement between pulmonary vein diameters measured on cardiac CT and 3DRA images. Integration of 3DRA-based LA surfaces with real-time fluoroscopy was easy and highly accurate. CONCLUSION: Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole or rapid ventricular pacing allow acquisition of 3DRA with an excellent direct contrast opacification of any cardiac chamber and a reduction of cardiac motion artefacts, resulting in high-quality per-procedural 3D imaging with a single C-arm rotation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ector et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Cardiac arrhythmias requiring ablation (n=40). Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole vs. Rapid right ventricular pacing was evaluated on Optimal 3D image quality (p=0.01). Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole more frequently resulted in optimal 3D image quality compared to rapid right ventricular pacing (42% vs 11%, P=0.01) during cardiac ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: