Key result
Intraprocedural 3DRA for AF ablation is linked to ~89% less radiation exposure than preprocedural CT.
Why the study?
Does intraprocedural 3D rotational angiography provide comparable left atrial imaging to preprocedural CT with less radiation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Observational (n=46)
Does intraprocedural 3D rotational angiography provide comparable left atrial imaging to preprocedural CT with less radiation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Intraprocedural 3D rotational angiography using rapid ventricular pacing is a feasible alternative to preprocedural CT for left atrial imaging during AF ablation, offering comparable anatomical data with significantly less radiation exposure.
May reduce radiation exposure in AF ablation; leaves open need for randomized trials confirming image quality and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) image of left atrium (LA) can greatly facilitate ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Reconstructing method using computed tomography (CT) has certain limitations. The 3D image of LA can be intraprocedurally reconstructed by a rotational angiography technique. METHODS: Forty-six patients undergoing AF ablation were included in this study. Preprocedural CT imaging and intraprocedural reconstructing 3D rotational angiogram (3DRA) of LA were performed in all the patients. Rapid ventricular pacing (RVP, 300 ms) was used to inhibit the drainage of atrium. During RVP, contrast medium was injected into the LA, and rotational angiography was performed. The 3DRA was reconstructed and was registered with the live fluoroscopy. The 3DRA was evaluated in comparison to the CT image. In the navigation of the registered 3DRA, the ablation of AF was performed. RESULTS: Forty-four 3DRAs (95.7%) were successfully reconstructed and registered with the live fluoroscopy. The LA anatomy was delineated in the 3DRA in comparison to a CT image. AF ablation was successfully performed in the 44 patients in the navigation of the registered 3DRA. There were good correlations in the PV ostial diameter and the LA volume as assessed by 3DRA in comparison to a CT image (r>=0.87). The radiation exposure in rotational angiography was substantially less than that in CT scanning (2.7+/-0.9 mSv vs. 24.9+/-3.1 mSv, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to reconstruct and register the 3DRA with live fluoroscopy using the RVP method during the ablation of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=46). Intraprocedural 3D rotational angiogram (3DRA) with rapid ventricular pacing vs. Preprocedural CT imaging was evaluated on Radiation exposure (p=<0.001). Intraprocedural 3D rotational angiography during atrial fibrillation ablation resulted in substantially lower radiation exposure compared to preprocedural CT scanning (2.7 vs. 24.9 mSv, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: