Key result
3D rotational angiography guidance shows no benefit over CT for AF recurrence after ablation.
Why the study?
Precise imaging of left atrial anatomy is essential for successful and safe catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, with 3D rotational angiography as a novel alternative to CT.
Does catheter ablation guided by 3DRA reduce recurrent AF or complications compared to CT guidance in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=125)
No
Does catheter ablation guided by 3DRA reduce recurrent AF or complications compared to CT guidance in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 24%
p-value: p=0.721
3DRA guidance for AF catheter ablation yields similar clinical outcomes and safety profiles compared to conventional CT guidance.
Supports 3DRA as alternative to CT for AF ablation guidance; hypothesis-generating pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation in the left atrium has become a common therapeutic strategy in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The high degree of success and safety profile of this procedure is dependent on precise knowledge of the true anatomy in the chamber. This information is imported mostly from cardiac computed tomography. A novel method for imaging the left atrial anatomy is three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA). METHODS: The aim of our study was to the compare clinical outcome and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by 3DRA vs. conventional CT scan. One hundred and twenty-five patients referred for AF catheter ablation at St. Anne's University Hospital Brno were included in the retrospective analysis of clinical outcome within the first year after the procedure. RESULTS: There was a close correlation in overall procedural parameters between the groups. The frequency of recurrent episodes of AF (24% in CT-guided group vs. 27% in 3DRA-guided group, P=0.721) as well as the onset of atypical atrial flutter after the procedure (10% vs. 8%, respectively, P=0.731) were similar in both groups. No difference in the number of patients necessitating repeat ablation (5% vs. 5%, P=0.984) was found. Procedural complications of ablations guided by 3DRA were comparable with those guided by CT (2% vs. 3%, respectively, P=0.568). CONCLUSION: 3DRA has proven to be a safe and simple method for imaging the left atrium and guiding catheter ablation for AF. This approach is anticipated to become a new standard in 3D reconstruction of the left atrium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehár et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=125). Three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) guidance vs. Computed tomography (CT) guidance was evaluated on Recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation (p=0.721). Three-dimensional rotational angiography guidance for atrial fibrillation ablation resulted in similar rates of recurrent atrial fibrillation compared to CT guidance (27% vs 24%, P=0.721).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: