Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wallace and Silsbee have recently interpreted the observation of a g=1.9988 signal in B-doped (100)Si/SiO₂ as the direct detection of inversion-layer electrons by electron-spin resonance (ESR)---an assignment mainly based on gate-bias sensitivity of the signal. An alternative interpretation, however, is offered evidencing that the reported signal originates from an inadvertently grown type-reversed Si layer near the interface comprising a high-volume density of shallow donors---a result of the particular sample preparation applied. Such a feature is amply documented in Si/SiO₂ literature and the characteristics of the attendant donor signal are well understood. Excessive line broadening is suggested as the reason why inversion-layer electrons remain as yet undetectable by direct ESR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Stesmans (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: