Key result
Slow delivery of epirubicin by micro osmotic pumps reduced cardiotoxicity without compromising the antineoplastic effect compared to intraperitoneal bolus delivery.
Why the study?
Does slow delivery of epirubicin via micro osmotic pumps reduce cardiotoxicity without compromising antineoplastic efficacy in animal models?
RCT
randomized
Does slow delivery of epirubicin via micro osmotic pumps reduce cardiotoxicity without compromising antineoplastic efficacy in animal models?
Slow intraperitoneal infusion of epirubicin via micro osmotic pumps mitigates cardiotoxicity without reducing antineoplastic efficacy in rodent models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Slow epirubicin infusion reduced cardiotoxicity without efficacy loss in animal models; leaves open clinical translation and practice change.
BACKGROUND: Continuous infusion of doxorubicin has been a strategy to reduce cardiotoxicity. Epirubicin is another anthracycline in common clinical use. However, evidence is lacking regarding whether this strategy can reduce cardiotoxicity of epirubicin without compromising antineoplastic efficacy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy rats were randomized into groups: epirubicin (8 mg/kg) delivered intraperitoneally via micro osmotic pumps (MOP), epirubicin (8 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal (IP) bolus injection, and placebo control. Blood samples were collected for analyzing biomarkers of myocardial injury and pharmacokinetics. At chosen times, sub-groups of animals were sacrificed for histopathology. A mouse breast cancer cell line (4T1), stably transfected with luciferase, was orthotopically allografted in female mice, and treated in three groups as described above for the rats. Tumor growth was monitored by measuring tumor size as well as bioluminescence. RESULTS: Delivery by IP bolus and by MOP achieved essentially the same area under the curve of epirubicin plasma concentration time profile. Blood biomarkers showed that the degree of myocardial injury in MOP group was lower than that of IP group. Histopathology showed that there was less eosinophilic enhancement, interstitial hemorrhage and necrotizing muscle atrophy in MOP group than IP group. In the orthotopic breast cancer allograft mouse model, the antineoplastic effect of epirubicin by MOP was not different from that by IP as measured by tumor weights or by in vivo bioluminescence. CONCLUSION: Slow delivery of epirubicin by MOP reduced cardiotoxicity without compromising the antineoplastic effect compared to IP bolus delivery. These in vivo data support our previous clinical data that continuous intravenous infusion of epirubicin using micro infusion pumps over 48-96 hours had less cardiotoxicity than intravenous bolus injections. However, whether multiple doses of epirubicin given by MOP result in a lower magnitude of long term cardiomyopathy remains to be further investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and breast cancer. Epirubicin via micro osmotic pumps (MOP) vs. Epirubicin by intraperitoneal (IP) bolus injection and placebo control was evaluated on Myocardial injury and antineoplastic effect. Slow delivery of epirubicin by micro osmotic pumps reduced cardiotoxicity without compromising the antineoplastic effect compared to intraperitoneal bolus delivery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: