Key result
The presence of a heart rate deflection point in trained cyclists coincided with stroke volume increasing until 78.0% of maximal power, compared to 94.4% in those without a deflection point (P=0.004).
Why the study?
Does the heart rate deflection point coincide with maximal stroke volume achievement during incremental exercise in endurance-trained subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=22)
Does the heart rate deflection point coincide with maximal stroke volume achievement during incremental exercise in endurance-trained subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 78% vs 94.4%
p-value: p=0.004
The heart rate deflection point during incremental exercise coincides with the optimal cardiac work for attaining maximal stroke volume in well-trained subjects.
Heart rate deflection may mark earlier stroke volume plateau in trained cyclists; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before testing protocols change.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether the heart rate (HR) deflection point (HRDP) in the HR-power relationship is concomitant with the maximal stroke volume (SV(max)) value achievement in endurance-trained subjects. Twenty-two international male cyclists (30.3 +/- 7.3 yr, 179.7 +/- 7.2 cm, 71.3 +/- 5.5 kg) undertook a graded cycling exercise (50 W every 3 min) in the upright position. Thoracic impedance was used to measure continuously the HR and stroke volume (SV) values. The HRDP was estimated by the third-order curvilinear regression method. As a result, 72.7% of the subjects (HRDP group, n = 16) presented a break point in their HR-work rate curve at 89.9 +/- 2.8% of their maximal HR value. The SV value increased until 78.0 +/- 9.3% of the power associated with maximal O(2) uptake (Vo(2 max)) in the HRDP group, whereas it increased until 94.4 +/- 8.6% of the power associated with Vo(2 max) in six other subjects (no-HRDP group, P = 0.004). Neither SV(max) (ml/beat or ml.beat(-1).m(-2)) nor Vo(2 max) (ml/min or ml.kg(-1).min(-1)) were different between both groups. However, SV significantly decreased before exhaustion in the HRDP group (153 +/- 44 vs. 144 +/- 40 ml/beat, P = 0.005). In the HRDP group, 62% of the variance in the power associated with the SV(max) could also be predicted by the power output at which HRDP appeared. In conclusion, in well-trained subjects, the power associated with the SV(max)-HRDP relationship supposed that the HR deflection coincided with the optimal cardiac work for which SV(max) was attained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leprêtre et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in endurance-trained subjects (n=22). Presence of heart rate deflection point (HRDP) vs. Absence of HRDP (no-HRDP group) was evaluated on Percentage of power associated with maximal O2 uptake at which stroke volume increased (p=0.004). The presence of a heart rate deflection point in trained cyclists coincided with stroke volume increasing until 78.0% of maximal power, compared to 94.4% in those without a deflection point (P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: