Key result
Routine intravenous contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.9%, specificity of 87.5%, and accuracy of 91.0% for diagnosing acute appendicitis in surgical cases.
Why the study?
Does routine intravenous contrast-enhanced CT accurately diagnose acute appendicitis in surgical patients?
Observational (n=78)
Does routine intravenous contrast-enhanced CT accurately diagnose acute appendicitis in surgical patients?
Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT is a highly sensitive and accurate technique for diagnosing acute appendicitis, with ancillary signs providing additional diagnostic value.
Supports routine IV contrast CT for appendicitis in surgical patients; extends Level 3 evidence but leaves open need for prospective validation.
This study evaluated the usefulness of routine, nonfocused intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Also evaluated was the diagnostic value of several findings that were clinically associated with acute appendicitis. Although a number of studies have shown various techniques using CT to be accurate in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, few studies have focused on CT with using only intravenous contrast material. Computed tomography scan criteria for acute appendicitis have been established chiefly on the basis of appendiceal findings. We, on the other hand, have often observed the following associated conditions during appendectomy: ascites, paresis of the intestine, or thickening of adjacent tissues. In this study, we reviewed the intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scans of 78 patients who had been diagnosed as having acute appendicitis and had subsequently undergone surgery. We also compared the CT scans with patients' surgical and histological findings. As a way of evaluating clinical ancillary signs, we identified and analyzed individual CT findings that included abnormal appendix, calcified appendicolith, ascites, dilated intestine, and cecal wall thickening. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in surgical cases were found to be 91.9%, 87.5%, and 91.0%, respectively. Individual findings except for abnormal appendix were not significantly common among patients who had acute appendicitis. However, more positive findings were observed in patients who had appendicitis than in those who had normal appendixes. Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scan is a useful technique in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The plurality of ancillary signs in CT scans also appears to be a helpful indicator in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwahashi et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Acute appendicitis (n=78). Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) vs. Surgical and histological findings was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy). Routine intravenous contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.9%, specificity of 87.5%, and accuracy of 91.0% for diagnosing acute appendicitis in surgical cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: