Why the study?
Different diagnostic techniques have been devised to assist in equivocal cases of acute appendicitis to decrease negative appendicectomy rates.
Does pelviabdominal computed tomography with contrast have higher diagnostic accuracy than the appendicitis inflammatory response score in diagnosing acute appendicitis?
Does pelviabdominal computed tomography with contrast have higher diagnostic accuracy than the appendicitis inflammatory response score in diagnosing acute appendicitis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pelviabdominal CT scan has significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than the AIR score for acute appendicitis, though an AIR score ≥5 remains a useful diagnostic tool when CT is unavailable.
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies, with a lifetime prevalencerate of approximately one in seven. A negative appendicectomy is taken as a surgery performed for a preoperativediagnosis of appendicitis that results in a normal histopathology specimen. Different techniques have been devisedto assist in equivocal cases in attempts to decrease negative appendicectomy rates.Aim of work: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of pelviabdominal computed tomography with oral andintravenous contrast versus appendicitis inflammatory response score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Patients and methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at (The General Surgery Department), AinShams University Hospitals between Jan 2023 and June 2023. 64 patients underwent appendectomy based onthe decision of the consultant after clinical examinations and investigations including pelviabdominal computedtomography with oral and intravenous contrast. The accuracy of the pelviabdominal computed tomography wascompared with the appendicitis inflammatory response score. The evaluation was based on the Histopathologypostoperatively in Standardized Pathology laboratory in Ain Shams University Hospital.Results: Histopathology among the studied patients was found positive in 60 cases (93.8%) negative 4 cases(6.2%). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) showed that the best cut off point of (AIR) score to detectpositive cases according to histopathology was ≥5 with sensitivity of 85.00%, specificity of 75.00%, PPV of 98.1%,NPV of 25.0% and total accuracy of 84.4.0%. CT scan sensitivity of 98.33%, specificity of 100.00%, PPV of100.0%, NPV of 80.0% and total accuracy of 99.2%. P vale was 0.041 when the cut off value of AIR score wasequal or more than 5 in comparison to CT scan.Conclusion: To conclude, this study validates that the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score has highdiscriminating powers and diagnostic accuracy they could aid in selecting patients who require timely surgery orthose who require further evaluation. The high probability score can be conclusive without use of CT scan, withinintermediate and low probability CT scan could add diagnostic value and decrease negative appendectomies. Incase of unavailability of CT scan AIR score can be used with cut off value equal or more 5 with high diagnosticaccuracy and sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelaziz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: