Key result
Assisted reproductive technology in women with heart disease is associated with higher maternal and neonatal complications, including hypertensive disorders and thromboembolic events.
Why the study?
Does assisted reproductive technology increase maternal and neonatal complications in women with heart disease compared to normal pregnancy?
Does assisted reproductive technology increase maternal and neonatal complications in women with heart disease compared to normal pregnancy?
Pre-pregnancy risk assessment is essential for women with heart disease considering assisted reproductive technology due to the increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications, including hemodynamic shifts and thromboembolic events.
Raises caution for ART in cardiac patients; leaves open dedicated prospective trials before practice change.
A growing number of women with heart disease are considering pregnancy with the help of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Although an ever-increasing amount of knowledge exists on pregnancy in both congenital and acquired heart disease patients, little information is available on fertility treatments specifically in these women. This review seeks to provide an overview of the existing data and explores areas in need of research in this field. Changes in the hormonal environment seen in ART patients initially entail an increase then a decrease in blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance. A shift in the thrombotic-thrombolytic balance towards coagulation is observed. Compared to normal pregnancy, ART-conceived pregnancies exhibit an increased adverse event rate for both the mother and foetus, including a higher incidence of hypertensive disorders and an increase in thromboembolic events during the first trimester. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in particular can cause dramatic haemodynamic changes and an increase in upper body thrombosis. Viewing these findings within the context of women with an underlying heart disease reveals indications that maternal and neonatal complications after fertility treatments are higher. Pre-pregnancy risk assessment is essential to identifying women with heart disease for whom ART may be dangerous and therefore inappropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossberg et al. (2016) conducted a review in Heart disease in women undergoing fertility treatment. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) vs. Normal pregnancy was evaluated. Assisted reproductive technology in women with heart disease is associated with higher maternal and neonatal complications, including hypertensive disorders and thromboembolic events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: