Key result
Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation with Microplegia in urgent CABG for recent myocardial infarction resulted in a 7% rate of MACCE and 1% in-hospital mortality.
Why the study?
The authors aimed to analyse the performance of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) concomitantly with Microplegia in patients with recent myocardial infarction undergoing urgent CABG surgery.
Does minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation with Microplegia improve outcomes compared to crystalloid cardioplegia in patients with recent MI undergoing urgent CABG?
Cohort (n=139)
Does minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation with Microplegia improve outcomes compared to crystalloid cardioplegia in patients with recent MI undergoing urgent CABG?
The use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation with Microplegia is feasible and safe for patients with recent myocardial infarction undergoing urgent CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of MiECC with Microplegia for urgent CABG after recent MI; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background: We aimed to analyse the performance of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) concomitantly with Microplegia, in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Methods: We included patients with a recent MI (≤7 days) undergoing isolated CABG surgery using MiECC. The primary endpoint was a major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event (MACCE). In a secondary analysis, we compared our institutional Microplegia concept with the use of a crystalloid single-shot cardioplegic solution. Results: In total, 139 patients (mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 66 ± 10 years) underwent urgent CABG surgery using Microplegia; 55% (n = 77) of the patients had an acute MI within 1−7 days preoperatively; 20% (n = 28) had an acute MI within 6−24 h; and 24% (n = 34) had an acute MI within <6 h preoperatively. The number of distal anastomoses was a geometric mean of 4 (95% confidence interval 3−4). The MACCE and in-hospital mortality were 7% (n = 10) and 1% (n = 2), respectively. The results were confirmed in a secondary analysis comparing Microplegia with crystalloid cardioplegic solution (n = 271). Conclusion: The use of MiECC with Microplegia in urgent CABG surgery is feasible and safe and provides a straight-forward intraoperative setting. Therefore, it can also be considered to retain the benefits of MiECC in urgent CABG surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koechlin et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Recent myocardial infarction undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (n=139). Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) with Microplegia vs. Crystalloid single-shot cardioplegic solution was evaluated on Major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event (MACCE). Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation with Microplegia in urgent CABG for recent myocardial infarction resulted in a 7% rate of MACCE and 1% in-hospital mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: