Key result
Minimal invasive extra-corporeal circulation (MiECC) resulted in a significantly higher nadir indexed oxygen delivery (305 vs 288 mL/min/m2) compared to conventional extra-corporeal circulation.
Why the study?
The benefits of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) in end stage coronary artery disease patients undergoing myocardial revascularization had not been described or evidenced by scientific studies.
Does minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation improve intraoperative hemodynamics and reduce lactate levels in end stage coronary artery disease patients undergoing CABG?
Cohort (n=60)
No
Does minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation improve intraoperative hemodynamics and reduce lactate levels in end stage coronary artery disease patients undergoing CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 305% vs 288%
p-value: p=0.037
In patients with end-stage CAD and severe LV dysfunction undergoing CABG, the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation improves oxygen delivery, reduces lactate levels, and decreases the need for red blood cell transfusions compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation.
Background: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing myocardial revascularization, with concomitant heart failure defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35%, constitute a population at risk of poor long-term prognosis and limited survival. The benefits of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) on end stage coronary artery disease patients undergoing myocardial revascularization has not been described and evidenced by scientific studies. Materials and Methods: In this single-centre control study of 60 end stage coronary artery disease patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.The patients was divided in two contemporary groups: in group (MiECC), n= 30 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was used MiECC, whereas, in group conventional extracorporeal circulation (cECC), n=30 CABG was used cECC. Results: Procedures of Group MiECC reported (mean values) of a DO 2i of 305 mL/min/m 2 in relation to O 2 ER i 21.5% vs a DO 2i of 288 mL/min/m 2 in relation to O 2 ER i 25.6% was found in group MiECC vs cECC (p=0.037). Lactate levels >3 mmol/L were reported in 7 group MiECC patients vs 20 group cECC patients (p=0.038), with blood glucose peak. Mean nadir Hb values during CPB were 9.7 g/dL in group MiECC vs 7.8 g/dL in group cECC (p = 0.044). CI during CPB was 2.4 L/min/m 2 in both groups. Total red blood cell administration was 8 units in group MiECC vs 21 units in group cECC (p=0.022). A glycemic peak was recorded in 7 patients of group MiECC vs 20 patients of group cECC (p=0.037). Conclusion: The MiECC technique on end stage coronary artery disease was associated with a higher DO 2i compared to cECC. MiECC patients showed a significant reduction in red blood cells units administration, in peak intraoperative lactate levels, which correlated with better postoperative renal outcome and shorter length of stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Condello et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in End stage coronary artery disease with concomitant heart failure (n=60). Minimal invasive extra-corporeal circulation (MiECC) vs. Conventional extra-corporeal circulation (cECC) was evaluated on Nadir indexed oxygen delivery (DO2i) during cardiopulmonary bypass (mL/min/m2) (p=0.037). Minimal invasive extra-corporeal circulation (MiECC) resulted in a significantly higher nadir indexed oxygen delivery (305 vs 288 mL/min/m2) compared to conventional extra-corporeal circulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: