Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We studied snags in 30 stands, 5-445 years old, of unmanaged and managed Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in western Oregon to gain information about snag populations and status after logging. As snag production rates (snags/ha/year) declined from about 100 to 1, mean snag density decreased from 190 to 18/ha in age-classes 35 and 200+, respectively; remnant snags (formed in previous stands) represented 5-14% of current densities. Meanwhile, average snag dbh increased from 13 to 72 cm, and as dbh increased, snags stood longer. Douglas-fir was the dominant species among snags in all forest age-classes. Linear regression analysis showed a correlation (P < 0.001) between snag age and deterioration; populations consisted of fewer young (sound) and old (highly decayed) than middle-aged (partially decayed) snags. Cluster analysis revealed 5 stages of deterioration based upon snag size and decay condition. In unmanaged stands, most (62%) snag populations were distributed randomly, but patches of snags were found in all age-classes. Fewer snags (P < 0.001) remained after thinning and clear-cutting unmanaged forests, and natural snag production was disrupted. Large snags should be retained within forests managed over long (>200-year) rotations; in riparian forests; in extensively managed, slow-growing forests; and within intensively managed forests, safety permitting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cline et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: