Key result
Multivariate analysis using blood pressure and heart rate data achieved a discriminant accuracy of approximately 92% for classifying the two most common orthostatic dysregulation subtypes.
Why the study?
Because orthostatic dysregulation specialists are scarce and doctors' experience is often relied upon for subtype classification, this study evaluated whether multivariate analysis of blood pressure and heart rate could reproduce doctor's subtype classification.
Can multivariate analysis using blood pressure and heart rate data accurately classify subtypes of orthostatic dysregulation in children?
Observational
Can multivariate analysis using blood pressure and heart rate data accurately classify subtypes of orthostatic dysregulation in children?
Multivariate analysis of blood pressure and heart rate data can accurately reproduce specialist classification of orthostatic dysregulation subtypes, potentially aiding diagnosis where specialists are scarce.
Multivariate analysis yields ~92% accuracy for common OD subtypes; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Orthostatic dysregulation (OD) is an autonomic nervous disorder of the circulatory system that occurs in students in the higher grades of elementary school and in high school. It has been reported to affect approximately 700,000 Japanese children and 30%-40% of children out of school. OD is often neglected because the primary symptoms reported by parents of children with OD include difficulty in waking up in the morning, headache, dizziness, and tiredness, which are also considered as personality traits. OD diagnosis is performed by a specialist in accordance with the guidelines established by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Psychosomatic Medicine in 2006. The test classifies OD into four subtypes, and each subtype is differently treated. However, because there are few OD specialists, a doctor's experience is often used for subtype classification. We attempted to determine the reproducibility of the doctor's rule of thumb using multivariate analysis, which is the simplest available method using the blood pressure and heart rate data obtained from the test. We obtained a discriminant accuracy of approximately 92% for the two most common OD subtypes. Despite the primary subtypes and limited subject data, we obtained positive results, potentially reproducing the doctor's rule of thumb.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirasuna et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Orthostatic dysregulation. Multivariate analysis using blood pressure and heart rate data vs. Doctor's rule of thumb was evaluated on Discriminant accuracy for the two most common OD subtypes. Multivariate analysis using blood pressure and heart rate data achieved a discriminant accuracy of approximately 92% for classifying the two most common orthostatic dysregulation subtypes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: