Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of BAY K 8644 was compared to that of CGP 28392 in isolated rat thoracic aorta. In low concentration both dihydropyridines had a direct concentration dependent contractile effect that could be eliminated in Ca-free medium and by the Ca-antagonist nifedipine. Readdition of Ca to the Ca-free medium restored the contractile response to both agents. In high concentrations (greater than or equal to 10(-5) M), both agents depressed active tone. In physiological salt solution containing 15.8 mM, potassium BAY K 8644 was far more potent in contracting rat aorta than CGP 28392. The responses to BAY K 8644 and CGP 28392 were not affected by alpha- and beta-adrenoceptorblockade. Both compounds shifted the noradrenaline- and potassium-concentration response curve to the left and increased the maximal response. Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) had a reversible and marked effect on BAY K 8644 and no effect on CGP 28392 contractions. The UVR-mediated relaxation of BAY K 8644-induced contractions could partly be eliminated by raising extracellular Ca. The results showed that differences according to potency and mode of action exist between BAY K 8644 and CGP 28392 in rat aorta. To explain the effect of UVR on BAY K 8644-induced contractions, a modification of a Ca channel model is proposed that implies the existence of "photosensitive proteins" located to "Ca antagonist" binding sites. According to this hypothesis, UVR may induce a reversible binding of BAY K 8644 to "Ca antagonist receptors."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikkelsen et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: