Key result
Targeted protein degraders show lower exposures and fail to reproduce primate QTc prolongation in guinea pigs.
Why the study?
Unexpected cardiovascular findings, primarily delayed ventricular repolarization and longer QTc intervals, have occurred during clinical trials of some targeted protein degraders. Whether guinea pigs are a suitable small animal model to characterize these cardiovascular effects earlier in development in alignment with 3R principles was unknown.
Does a guinea pig model accurately characterize cardiovascular toxicity and QTc prolongation risks of targeted protein degraders compared to non-human primates?
Does a guinea pig model accurately characterize cardiovascular toxicity and QTc prolongation risks of targeted protein degraders compared to non-human primates?
Conscious and anesthetized guinea pig models failed to replicate the QTc prolongation seen in non-human primates across four targeted protein degraders, indicating they are not suitable models for early cardiovascular liability screening of these compounds.
Guinea pig models should be avoided for QTc screening of targeted protein degraders; leaves open validation of alternative small-animal models.
Targeted protein degradation is an active area of pharmaceutical research and development with the promise to increase the potential number of druggable targets across numerous therapeutic areas. One challenge in their current development has been unexpected cardiovascular findings that have been reported during clinical trials with some degraders, primarily delayed ventricular repolarization manifested as longer corrected QT (QTc) intervals and potential for increased arrhythmic risk. The objective of this study was to investigate whether guinea pigs might be a suitable small animal model to characterize potential cardiovascular effects earlier in degrader development in alignment with 3R principles. The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects were measured in naïve guinea pigs using 4 distinct degraders previously tested in non-human primates. We found exposures were broadly lower in guinea pigs than non-human primates, and dose-limiting toxicity was observed with some degraders after increasing the dose (mg/kg) in guinea pigs to account for the lower exposures. No consistent CV changes were observed across all 4 degraders, which was not translatable to the QTc interval prolongation observed in non-human primates administered the same degraders. Lastly, an anesthetized guinea pig model was investigated to evaluate acute cardiovascular changes at elevated in vivo exposures beyond those achieved in the conscious preparations. However, no consistent changes were observed in QTc intervals. In this context of this preliminary investigation of 4 degraders, the guinea pig model was not a suitable option for evaluating cardiovascular liabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kremer et al. (2026) studied Cardiovascular toxicity (QTc interval prolongation) associated with targeted protein degraders. 4 distinct targeted protein degraders vs. Historical non-human primate data was evaluated on Pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects (including corrected QT [QTc] interval prolongation). Four targeted protein degraders produced lower exposures and no consistent QTc changes in guinea pigs, failing to translate non-human primate QTc prolongation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: