Why the study?
Does banning indoor tobacco smoking in restaurants reduce the incidence of acute myocardial infarction in the general population?
Does banning indoor tobacco smoking in restaurants reduce the incidence of acute myocardial infarction in the general population?
Implementation of a nationwide indoor restaurant smoking ban is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction.
Supports smoke-free restaurant policies for AMI reduction; leaves open causal confirmation in randomized studies.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in nationwide acute myocardial infarction (AMI) incidence following the implementation of a law banning smoking indoors in restaurants on 1 June 2007. METHODS: Retrospective registry study of all hospitalisations for AMI in Finland. All 34,887 hospitalisations for AMI between 1 June 2005 and 31 May 2009 were identified from the Care Register for Health Care (CRHC) and statistics for tobacco consumption were obtained from the National Institute for Health and Welfare. Comorbidities for individual hospitalisations were searched from the CRHC. RESULTS: The incidence rate of AMI was reduced by 6.3% (95% CI 4.1% to 8.6%; p<0.0001) in the latter half of the study period following the smoking ban when adjusted for age, gender and overall population prevalence of smoking. Short-term incidence of AMI (6-month prior vs 6 months after the smoking ban) was also reduced (4.5%, 95% CI 0.2% to 9.0%; p=0.0399) and was largest in the working middle-aged group (40-50 years) but observed also in the oldest age group (>70 years). The incidence rates declined similarly for men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Banning indoor tobacco smoking in restaurants was associated with a mild additional reduction in AMI incidence on a nationwide level in Finland.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sipilä et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: