Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study we performed a systematic comparative analysis of two culture environments-flat/adhesive liquid and three-dimensional collagen gel-upon in vitro ovarian follicle development. We paid particular attention to the effects of in vitro environments upon the preservation of follicular structure and of peri- and intra-follicular extracellular matrix. We show that flat/adhesive environment leads to an obvious distortion of follicle morphology, marked extracellular matrix modifications and high rates of spontaneous, i.e., FSH-independent, follicle disruption. In contrast, three-dimensional collagen gel environments are able to maintain follicular structure with an in vivo-like basal lamina architecture, minimizing spontaneous disruption. Follicle distortions found in flat/adhesive culture systems include a pronounced flattening, causing the follicle horizontal diameters not to adequately reflect follicle volume. Our volume data, based on three-axis follicle diameter measurements, indicate that three-dimensional collagen gel environments increase follicle growth, particularly in response to FSH. This study demonstrates that preservation of both peri- and intra-follicular extracellular matrix compartments during the in vitro growth and differentiation of ovarian follicles is highly desirable, and is now possible through the use of appropriate three-dimensional collagen gel culture environments. This system allows a better understanding of the specific roles played by each of the follicle compartments during development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomes et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: