Why the study?
The efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism may vary depending on the primary cancer site.
Does oral apixaban compared to subcutaneous dalteparin improve efficacy and safety in patients with cancer-associated VTE across different cancer sites?
Population
Patients with VTE and different cancer sites randomized in the Caravaggio study
Comparison
Oral apixaban vs subcutaneous dalteparin
Design
Subgroup analysis of a randomized trial
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
Apixaban offers consistent efficacy and safety across cancer sites; subgroup findings leave open questions on site-specific risk differences.
Does oral apixaban compared to subcutaneous dalteparin improve efficacy and safety in patients with cancer-associated VTE across different cancer sites?
Oral apixaban is a valid alternative to subcutaneous dalteparin for treating cancer-associated VTE across a wide spectrum of primary cancer sites, with no significant differences in efficacy or safety by site.
Agnelli et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: