Why the study?
Does a prasugrel 60-mg loading dose improve inhibition of platelet aggregation and reduce poor responder rates compared to a clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose?
Does a prasugrel 60-mg loading dose improve inhibition of platelet aggregation and reduce poor responder rates compared to a clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A prasugrel 60-mg loading dose provides significantly greater and more consistent platelet inhibition compared to a clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose, eliminating poor responder rates.
Multiple studies report response variability to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose (LD). Pooled platelet aggregometry data compared responses (change in maximal platelet aggregation [DeltaMPA] or inhibition of platelet aggregation [IPA]) to clopidogrel 300-mg (n = 131) or prasugrel 60-mg (n = 109) LDs. Poor responder rates were determined using empiric criteria (IPA < 10% and DeltaMPA < 10% for 20 microM and 5 microM adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) and Bayesian model-based criteria (IPA < 20% and DeltaMPA < 15% for 20 microM ADP; IPA < 25% and DeltaMPA < 20% for 5 microM ADP). Prasugrel achieved greater DeltaMPA and IPA from 2 to 24 hours post-LD (P < .001). For 20 microM ADP, poor responder rates for clopidogrel ranged from 17% to 43%; no prasugrel poor responders were observed. Regardless of the criterion, prasugrel 60 mg achieved greater IPA and fewer poor responders than the clopidogrel 300-mg LD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weerakkody et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: