Why the study?
Does pulsatile mechanical circulatory support improve regional organ blood flow compared to nonpulsatile support in a pig model of acute myocardial infarction?
Population
Pig model of acute myocardial infarction
Comparison
Pulsatile biventricular assisted circulation for… vs Nonpulsatile biventricular assisted circulation…
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
3 hours
Authors
Loading...
Pulsatile MCS may enhance renal and hepatic perfusion in acute HF models; hypothesis-generating for human trials, should not yet change practice.
Does pulsatile mechanical circulatory support improve regional organ blood flow compared to nonpulsatile support in a pig model of acute myocardial infarction?
Pulsatile mechanical circulatory support provides superior kidney and liver regional blood flow and microcirculation compared to nonpulsatile support in a preclinical model of acute heart failure.
Sezai et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: