Healthy volunteers were subjected to irritation by sodium lauryl sulphate at concentrations in the range 0.002% to 5.0% applied in Finn Chambers for 24 h. Test sites were visually assessed 1 h and 24 h after cessation of exposure. At the same times electrical impedance was measured with a new impedance device which allows non-invasive local measurements to a controlled depth. Close agreement between concentration and an irritation index calculated from electrical impedance parameters was found over the whole concentration range for most test persons. At concentrations below 0.2%, visual scores were zero. These results suggest that electrical impedance can be used as an objective tool to record irritation, and further that electrical impedance might be a more sensitive method than the commonly used visual readings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ollmar et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: