Why the study?
Do iron oxide nanoparticles improve the imaging of myocardial inflammation compared to gadolinium-based compounds in patients with acute myocardial infarction or myocarditis?
Do iron oxide nanoparticles improve the imaging of myocardial inflammation compared to gadolinium-based compounds in patients with acute myocardial infarction or myocarditis?
Iron oxide nanoparticles may offer superior diagnostic value over gadolinium-based contrast agents for CMR imaging of myocardial inflammation.
May support iron oxide nanoparticles for myocardial inflammation imaging in AMI; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an integral part in the diagnostic work-up of cardiac inflammatory diseases. In this context, superparamagnetic iron oxide-based contrast agents can provide additional diagnostic information regarding the assessment of myocardial infarction and myocarditis. After intravenous administration, these nanoparticles are taken up by activated monocytes and macrophages, which predominantly accumulate in regions associated with inflammation as was successfully shown in recent preclinical studies. Furthermore, first clinical studies with a new iron oxide-complex that was clinically approved for the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia recently demonstrated a superior diagnostic value of iron oxide nanoparticles compared to gadolinium-based compounds for imaging of myocardial inflammation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. In this article, we outline the basic features of superparamagnetic iron oxide-based contrast agents and review recent studies using such nanoparticles for cardiac imaging in case of acute myocardial infarction as well as acute myocarditis. Moreover, we highlight the translational potential of these agents and possible research applications with regard to imaging and therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bietenbeck et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: