Why the study?
Malperfusion syndrome in type A aortic dissection carries high mortality, and treatment paradigms have shifted toward malperfusion correction prior to delayed proximal aortic repair.
Does a TEVAR-first hybrid approach reduce mortality compared to conventional emergent ascending aortic repair in hemodynamically stable patients with type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion?
Does a TEVAR-first hybrid approach reduce mortality compared to conventional emergent ascending aortic repair in hemodynamically stable patients with type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion?
A TEVAR-first hybrid approach may improve survival in patients with type A aortic dissection complicated by mesenteric malperfusion by prioritizing early restoration of visceral blood flow.
May support malperfusion-first strategy in TAAD; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
The presence of malperfusion syndrome in type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is associated with a difficult and delayed diagnosis and high mortality. Current treatment paradigms have recently shifted towards correction of malperfusion followed by delayed proximal aortic repair approach for this challenging situation. This approach is based on the hypothesis that early restoration of blood flow to visceral tissue beds could prevent the lethal cascade of events leading to a necrotic bowel, persistent acidosis, and death. Several open and endovascular techniques have been described to address this treacherous complication. The objective of this work is to review the thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)-first hybrid approach adopted at Emory University, in which a thoracic endograft is deployed in the true lumen first to restore adequate inflow to the relevant branch vessels. After successful reperfusion, aggressive volume resuscitation is adopted with the goal to correct metabolic acidosis under guarded conditions, while maintaining normotension for 24 hours. Proximal aortic repair is then performed using hypothermic circulatory arrest. This approach is suitable for hemodynamically stable patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of mesenteric ischemia and has shown improved outcomes with lower mortality rates, as compared to the conventional approach of emergent ascending aortic repair followed by laparotomy to address the presence of ischemic bowel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalra et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: