Why the study?
What preoperative factors predict postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for post-infarction ventricular septal defect?
What preoperative factors predict postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for post-infarction ventricular septal defect?
Right ventricular coronary perfusion and lower right ventricular end-diastolic pressure are significant predictors of survival in patients undergoing surgery for post-infarction ventricular septal defect.
RV metrics may inform preoperative risk stratification in post-infarction VSD repair; hypothesis-generating for targeted interventions.
Mortality from a post-infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) can be reduced by surgery, selection for which would be helped by knowledge of factors affecting the postoperative prognosis. We reviewed our 9-year experience (1978-1987) of 40 surgically treated patients, comparing preoperative characteristics in those who died postoperatively (n = 15, 37%) and those who survived (n = 25, 63%), all still alive. Sex, age, infarct size as assessed by peak serum creatine kinase values, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and pulmonary/systemic flow ratio (2.9 +/- 0.2 vs 3.1 +/- 0.3) were similar. Survivors had a lower incidence of inferior infarct than those who died (6, 24% vs 9, 60%, P less than 0.05), a lower incidence of cardiogenic shock (7, 28% vs 10, 67%, P less than 0.05), less elevation of right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (10.1 +/- 0.9 vs 14.7 +/- 1.0 mm Hg, P less than 0.01) and less impairment of right ventricular coronary supply as determined by a coronary angiography-derived myocardial score (0.9 +/- 0.3 vs 4.7 +/- 0.7, P less than 0.001). The data suggest that right ventricular coronary perfusion influences prognosis. The proposed angiographic score may help to identify preoperatively those patients most likely to benefit from surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angelini et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: