Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary. The reaction of NO+ with O3 has been found to be unmeasurably slow at 300°K in laboratory flowing afterglow experiments, k < 10−14 cm³ sec−1. This reaction has conceivable importance as (1) a loss process for NO+ in the D region, where presently known loss processes are insufficient, (2) a possible source of NO2+, which has been observed in the ionosphere, and (3) a possible source of O2(¹Δg) in the atmosphere. The finding that the reaction is very slow weighs against its atmospheric importance. The reaction has been suggested as a possible NO+ loss process and NO2+ source in a disturbed atmosphere [Bortner, 1966] and as a possible source of O2(¹Δg) in auroras [Swider, 1972]. In addition, an ion of mass 46+, presumably NO2+, has been observed in the undisturbed ionosphere [Narcisi, 1967], and (1) is a candidate for this. All these proposals are of interest and are somewhat pressing, since (1) current NO+ loss processes are known to be insufficient, (2) known auroral O2(¹Δg) production processes are seriously deficient, and (3) no alternative source of NO2+ has been suggested. With this situation in mind we have attempted to determine the rate constant for (1) in the NOAA flowing afterglow facility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fehsenfeld et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: