This paper provides a detailed five-step procedure for conducting pharmacist-led medication reviews in acute admissions units to standardize practice and improve reproducibility.
May standardize pharmacist-led reviews in acute admissions; leaves open outcome benefits pending prospective trials.
Objectives Over the last decades, several papers have evaluated clinical pharmacy interventions in hospital settings with conflicting findings as results. Medication reviews are frequently a central component of these interventions. However, the term ‘medication review’ covers a plethora of principles and methodologies, and the practical procedure is seldom described in detail, which makes reproducing study findings difficult. The objective of this paper is to provide a detailed description of a procedure developed and used for pharmacist-led medication review in acute admissions units. Methods A procedure was developed based on clinical experience and inspiration from previous studies and literature on medication review models. The procedure was developed to fit the busy workflow in acute admissions units. Results The procedure consists of five steps: (1) collection of clinical patient data, (2) collection of information about the patient9s medical treatment, (3) patient interview, (4) critical examination of the patient9s medications and (5) recommendations for the hospital physician. Conclusions We have provided a detailed description of a procedure for pharmacist-led medication review. We do so, not to provide or advocate a single one-size-fits-all solution, but in an attempt to inspire a debate of the practical approach on how to execute a systematic medication review in order to develop and expand clinical pharmacy and achieve better patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verhagen et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: