Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The microbial modification of several trichothecene mycotoxins by trichothecene-producing strains of Fusarium nivale and F. solani was studied. These results were compared with the corresponding chemical modifications. The growing mycelia of Fusarium spp. did not convert 4beta-acetoxy-3alpha,7alpha, 15-trihydroxy-12, 13-epoxytrichothec-9-en-8-one (fusarenon) into 3alpha,4beta, 7alpha,15-tetrahydroxy-12,13-epoxy-trichothec-9-en-8-one (nivalenol), whereas 3alpha,4beta,7alpha,15-tetracetoxy-12,13-epoxytrichothec-9-en-8-one (tetraacetylnivalenol) was deacetylated to yield 3alpha-hydroxy-4beta,7alpha,15-triacetoxy-12,13-epoxytrichothec-9-en-8-one (4,7,15-triae-tylnivalenol), which was resistant to further deacetylation. T-2 toxin was transformed intoHT-2 toxin, and 8alpha-(3-methylbutyryloxy)-3alpha,4beta,-15-triacetoxy-12,13-epoxytrichothec-9-en-8-one (T-2 acetate) was transformed into HT-2 toxin via T-2 toxin. Chemical modification with ammonium hydroxide converted tetraacetylnivalenol into fusarenon via 4,7,15-triacetylnivalenol. 3alpha-7alpha,15-Triacetoxy-12,13-epoxytrichothec-9-en-8-one (triacetyldeoxynivalenol) gave deacetylation products lacking the C-7 or c-15 acetyl group in addition to 7alpha,15- diacetoxy-3alpha-hydroxy-12, 13-epoxytrichothec-9-en-8-one (7,15-diacetyldeoxynivalenol). These results demonstrate the regio-selectivity in microbial modification of trichothecenes. Based on the results and available knowledge concerning the transformation of trichothecenes, mechanisms for biological modifications of these mycotoxins are postulated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshizawa et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: