Why the study?
The study evaluated whether residents and fellows' decisions to evaluate critical care anesthesiologists were associated with clinical interactions documented in electronic health record progress notes and whether that influenced supervision score reliability.
Electronic health record data verifying joint workload should be used to select raters for evaluating clinical supervision, as lack of documented interaction is strongly associated with inability to evaluate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Insufficient interaction was associated with opting out of evaluations; leaves open whether supervision scores remain reliable without interaction thresholds.
Hadler et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: